Modules v Boards

[BrianMoore]

Kathy,

I'd go for the latter. All of the new modules built at Western Union module units only have "proper" modular connections on the outside two boards. There's more than enough "playability" in them, and your other option seems to add needless complication. You'll still have lots of fun anyway, and more freedom to put tracks where you want. I've usually found that in other circumstances too, providing lots of options still results in making use of very few of them.

Brian

[Mike_R]

A track plan would give us a better idea.

My HO modules have a board added on one end (with several tracks) to one end to allow them to be used alone.

Mike Ruby

[calaf01]

It all depends on whether you want to go for variety within your module or make your module fixed which gives you more planning options within a fixed module, if you see what I mean. There is another option, I suppose, and that is to arrange your track plan so that it's possible to be able to rearrange your boards within the module, so you have fixed module ends but variety in between. That way you're not constrained by having to have a module interface between each board. Though I'm not sure how that would work with your curved fascias. I was thinking of something like the Beer Line project railroad in Model Railroader a couple of years ago where they had four boards that they could make into O, U, F and J shapes. You're more constrained than that because you want a proper module interface at each end, but I thought it might jog a flash of inspiration for you.

Well, it was a thought.

Alan Crooks

[Mike_R]

There is another option, I suppose, and that is to arrange your track plan so that it's possible to be able to rearrange your boards within the module, so you have fixed module ends but variety in between.

11th Avenue was designed that way. The middle join has all tracks crossing at 90 degrees, so that boards could be added in the middle. In actual fact I ended up putting boards on each end. It now has another board on one end to change standards for single track use. With a fiddle yard attached, it could operate as a stand alone layout.

If you plan it right a modular layout can be very flexible.

Mike Ruby

[Mike_R]

Interesting idea to make the boards so interchangeable.
I'm not sure if that compromises the layout too much. Wouldn't it make scenery hard to do as all joins would have to be the same? All tracks would have to be the same standard, I would lay sidings and spurs to a lower standard than the mainline. My hand laid logging line has different tie spacing depending on the track use, 11th Avenue has smaller rail and lower trackbeds on sidings and spurs.

For 11th AvenueI have gone for a less interchangeable plan, where the four main boards go in a fixed order, but boards can be added into or the ends of the basic four. I have all the main turnouts on those four boards, adding boards to the ends or middle lengthen the sidings and loops, or allow it to be used with different standards.
An example of this is at the 10th November modular meet in Exeter it will be a terminus with the four boards plus a single track adaptor at one end. The next week end it will have two foot boards on each end and be a two track mainline on a continuous loop.